• vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          it is now provably not secure. Because pos is provably not objective. Making the whole thing moot. Also, it is literally a system explicitly designed around “the rich get richer”.

              • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Even if it is (I don’t see your reasoning explaining that) that doesn’t mean the resulting security scheme is objective.

        • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Isn’t ethereum a centralised shit coin with a money printer attached, controlled by the owners of the “foundation?”

          • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            In what way is Ethereum centralized?
            The owers of ETH contribute to the consensus.
            How would the foundation control any of that?
            Mybe you confuse Ethereum with IOTA?