In-N-Out Burger says it will close its first location in its 75-year history due to a wave of car break-ins, property damage, theft and robberies affecting customers and employees alike at its only restaurant in Oakland, California.

The fast-food burger joint in a busy corridor near Oakland International Airport will close on March 24 because even though the company has taken “repeated steps to create safer conditions our Customers and Associates are regularly victimized,” Denny Warnick, In-N-Out’s chief operating officer, said in a statement Wednesday.

  • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    was crime really plummeting at a time when we were seeing a slew of security videos showing mass amounts of organized smash-and-grabs all over California?

    • stevehobbes@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      You’re getting downvotes, presumably from people who haven’t spent any time in NorCal. This is a problem everywhere there from Oakland, to SF, to Palo Alto and San Jose. No where in the bay in safe from this.

      No locals leave anything of value in there car for any amount of time.

      I learned that in 2013 when my rental was broken into in a fancy Palo Alto restaurant.

      But these aren’t violent crimes, which I think are declining, just property crimes.

      • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        If you go resturants around lunch you’ll see a bunch of people with a laptop bag or backpack but they don’t get their computers out. Companies tell their employees to never leave laptops in their cars, even for just a minute.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      social media can let people believe what they want, but the retail org that claimed closed stores were from shoplifting retracted their claims after it was revealed they were unsourced hearsay. Most closures have been from low sales in office districts since remote work expanded

      • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        social media

        no, It was security camera footage

        the retail org that claimed closed stores were from shoplifting retracted their claims after it was revealed they were unsourced hearsay

        yeah I read that article too. It was one article.

        vs several clips of security footage showing increased incidences of smash-and-grabs from dozens of different retail stores

        sure they closed cracker barrels and Walmarts and Targets and CVS stores in all the high-crime areas due to “low sales in office districts since remote work expanded.” sure.

        Is that the same reason those same stores we go to now have most of the products displayed behind locked cases which necessitates customers tracking down an employee just to purchase a pair of hair clipping scissors? Yes I kid you not, I wanted to buy a pair of hair clipping scissors from a Walmart in California a couple years ago and it was locked behind a case and I had to track down an employee just to purchase a pair of scissors that were locked behind a plexiglass case.

        do they keep all that merchandise locked behind a plexiglass case due to “low sales in office district since remote work expanded?” or due to increased incidences of theft?

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          the crime stats and lost goods in those stores were not particularly exceptional. What was exceptional was low sales at those stores.

          often when you get a clip, you don’t even know what the date is. I’ve seen people post shit from the 1980s saying it was yesterday. Clips show that something happened somewhere at some point, not that rates are going up or down.

          • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s both, in high theft areas you need more sales to offset your losses. Low sales and high theft will close a buisness fast.