• mHtt@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    yes, guilt by association is not evidence of a crime.

    fuck your mob mentality and fuck you because you would want the same defense I am giving Mr Kraft.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      guilt by being very close friends with a known sex criminal who gives you advice on lawyers to help with the sex crime charges you are facing is a little bit beyond simple association.

      • mHtt@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        i was fine before you opened your mouth. anger can be a gift if wielded appropriately. you deserve it.

        anger is not my default emotion, so i dont lead with it on the internet with strangers.

        i am allowed to utilized it like sadness or happiness or any other emotion. thanks for noticing

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 days ago

          Do you seriously not see the problem of his taking advice on who to retain for his impending sex crime case from a man who had been a convicted pedo for over a decade? I’ll grant you Epstein could have been making shit up in his email but I don’t need to nor will I give Rub and Tug Bob Kraft the benefit of the doubt.

          • mHtt@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            3 days ago

            i mean the man is walking around free so the advice was prudent?

            association with crime is not itself a crime.

            you are reaching FR.