• apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sold at Williams Sonoma says it all. That’s way overpriced. Also the amount of times I have dropped a piece of my aeropress, this would last a month, tops.

  • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    The pricing for every single one of the new aeropress products are absolutely crazy. I would have loved an XL if it wasn’t the price of three original aeropresses.

    • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah they have had MBA SKU madness takeover. They have far too much to sell these days for the simplicity of their original idea.

  • rubikcuber@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    Can’t say that heat loss is a big issue with my 10+ year old Aeropress. Still going strong. Although to be honest my £65 FB Marketplace Gaggia Baby gets way more use. 150 bucks sounds a bit steep for what it is.

  • WhyAUsername_1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I am happy with my cheap knockoff aeropress that I throw in my luggage bag when I travel . If I loose it, I buy a new inexpensive aeropress.

    Why the hell would I want a glass aeropress?

    • Gxost@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s for those who use AeroPress at home and are concerned about microplastics.

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        If I was slowly eating my aeropress I would have finished by now. My mama might have raised an idiot, but I finish my food.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      To use at home, instead of a much cheaper French press, or a similarly priced cheap espresso machine that makes coffee 100x better. Obviously /s

      • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I see your sarcasm, but all three of these things make very different types of coffee. Even if you can’t tell the difference between Aeropress and French press coffee (which probably not a large percent of people can), you can certainly tell the difference between espresso and immersion, right?

        As for this thing: plastics do degrade over time, and an insulated glass body is a nice upgrade. The metal press won’t contribute anything to the coffee quality, but it looks better, and probably feels nicer.

          • catalyst@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            This is true. I know I’ve gone through a few gasket replacements myself. I can tell it’s starting to fail when the pressure starts to feel weirdly weak and too easy to press down on.

          • Huh. I’ve had mine for over a decade; granted, it only for heavy use for a few months when I first got it, and about once a week since, and the rubber gasket is fine. I have no doubt that you’re right; gaskets almost always require semi-regular replacement; I have to replace the gaskets in my espresso machine every 2-3 years, and boy is that a chore. Those are doing far heavier duty than the Aeropress gasket, so I’d expect it to last longer. How fast did your’s fail?

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Plastics may degrade, but (as others have mentioned) if a plastic one lasts 10+ years, so far, where’s the value in a glass one?

          Plus you could buy 4 plastic ones for the cost of 1 glass that could far more easily break.

          I’m all for glass in a LOT of stuff. I even kind of like it here (for the reasons you’ve stated), I just can’t get behind the cost.

          I tend to go for better/best quality in most things, I hate buying stuff twice. But there’s value in being able to replace a less robust device for 1/4 the cost of the “higher quality” version.

          • drphungky@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            Plastics may degrade, but (as others have mentioned) if a plastic one lasts 10+ years

            Micro plastics can be released as soon as a water bottle is first filled. This isn’t the structural integrity of the plastic failing, it’s your endocrine system and who knows what else being affected by tiny pieces of plastic that start shedding immediately.

            Look, I’m not saying this isn’t a cash grab because the serial inventor who made the aero press sold a controlling stake in his company and the new firm is squeezing as much money out as they can before the patent expires, BUT some of us do care about micro plastics. Not that I give my daughter coffee, but now that I have a toddler we’ve eliminated as much food related plastic as we can.

            Stuff is genuinely damaging and yet we keep using it because it’s convenient. And people wonder why the Romans used lead containers.

      • Evkob@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Unless you’re buying used (or you really know what you’re doing), you’ll get way better coffee out of the Aeropress than the espresso machine for that price

        Of course, the point is moot when you could make coffee just as well in a cheap plastic Aeropress.

        • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          The De’Longhi Dedica is around €140 new and, while it’s not something to write home about, will do much better coffee than an aeropress.

          • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Agreed.

            Delonghi does some magic to make a cheap espresso machine actually produce sufficient pressure for a fast brew.

            Their old machine, circa 2005 worked, but not well.

            The newer ones have been tested numerous times and produce the pressure they’re labeled to, and maintain it across the brew. Mine is always done in just under 20 seconds, and when I’ve (intentionally) over-pressed the coffee into the portafilter it may take 30. The old one couldn’t even handle a we’ll-pressed puck.

            The new steamer works far better too. I never did like their old “steam assist” trickery. The new one uses an actual wand inside the “assist tube” . If you take off the assist, it works just like an actual wand. I’m not even sure why the assist tube is there.

            Everyone I’ve made an espresso for has been surprised I didn’t pay $500+ for a machine.

            For the typical home user, you really can’t beat a Delonghi, given it’s at most $150.

    • SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not just worried about dropping, but this is something you press down on.

      People generally clumsy or pressing too hard are going to have a bad time if they manage to break the glass while pressing down.

  • catalyst@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    I love my aeropress, but this seems highly unnecessary to me. I think it’s great that I’ve had the old one for over a decade, I can chuck it in the sink or a drawer and it’s practically indestructible.

    I can’t say I’ve ever once noticed my cup being cold after pressing so claims about heat loss feel suspect.

    I suppose if you just want the same experience but to feel fancier while doing so and you have cash to spend on it, then go right ahead.

    Heck I still chuckle when I am reminded of the aeropress XL. If folks aren’t aware the aeropress company was mostly bought out a few years back which may explain the recent burst in new fangled products.

    • Gxost@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Heat loss is related to glass, not plastic. Brewers made of glass, ceramics or metal must be preheated before brewing. For AeroPress Premium, heat loss may be not that big, but we need feedback from owners to know exactly.

  • Howdy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I do the inverted aeropress method and have an accident or two. Even using it as directed method there is not way I would want to buy this because it is breakable.

    • zabadoh@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      What would a funnel be for? I can’t think of a use for one off the top of my head.

      • shatteredsword@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        The original aeropress had a funnel. It was useful for a couple of reasons. Made it easier to get grounds in the aeropress (I’m very clumsy). I also use the inverted method so I place the filter in the end cap and then place the end cap inside the funnel before i pour hot water over it to get the filter to stick to the end cap without having to worry about burning my hands