• 9WhiteTeeth@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Yeah, it seems like it’s actually working as intended?

      EDIT: peoples hate boner for AI at full display. Calm down, motherfuckers

      • lauha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        2 days ago

        Does it say “100% plagiarised”? No. It says it is 100% AI generated which is clearly false.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        2 days ago

        It isn’t saying “I recognize this text”, it is saying “this text is AI generated”.

        And then it’s offering a service to rewrite it, with ai, so that it can’t be recognized as ai.

        It’s doing SOMETHING, for sure. I just don’t think what it’s doing results in accurate results for what it claims to measure.

        • 13igTyme@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          That’s how they get you. You’ll pay money to get AI to make it appear human. Then another AI will detect the AI writing and offer to change it for a fee. They are all in on it. This keeps going until society collapses… Or people stop using fake AI detectors.

        • Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I mean… No? We had plagiarism checkers long before these AI checkers, and the latter very specifically advertises that it’s meant to detect if an LLM generated the text, not whether it’s original text. Completely different tools with different purposes.