• AuroraZzz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Banks being unable to pay off their clients would result in a great depression-like economic crash (think about the movie, it’s a wonderful life at the end). Not to say that this wouldn’t be horrible as it would rebalance the ratio of wealth by basically taking all the money from rich people and destroying it. It would also raise the value of the dollar by increasing its scarcity. It would bankrupt companies as they would not be able to borrow money in order to stay afloat. Basically it would screw over everybody except for people that don’t use banks

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah grocery stores run on pencil-thin margins, and many of them rely on lines of credit to get through their day-to-day.

        Banks in this scenario would suddenly be unable to fulfill credit lines and now a grocery store is left unable to purchase goods to fill their store.

        It hurts anyone who eats fucking food which is all of us.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Lines of credit are usually private net 30/60 agreements with suppliers, not through a bank.

          If a grocery store is operating under debt, it needs only raise prices to cover the difference. Not paying interest to banks would become a cost savings.

    • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      The people who the bank would payout, with the 20% fractional that they hold in reserve?

      Yea, that’d be the rich people. The rich might lose some money, but the rich are never going to go hungry, not even in this scenario, that’s just not how life works.