• whodatdair@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Fuckin LLM bubble needs to burst already. I want some crazy compute cards to play with.

    Also, who knew the only people who would pay 2400/yr for access would bebe the ones who plan to make hundreds of queries per day. What do like, people try to think about value for money before they buy stuff?! What are you all… like not filthy rich?! Ew.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think this is just OpenAI marketing.

    “Insane thing: We are currently losing money on OpenAI Pro subscriptions!” he wrote in a post.

    The problem? Well according to @Sama, “people use it much more than we expected.”

    Oh no, ChatGPT is too useful to customers! Altman isn’t going to be telling any real problems that OpenAI has to the whole world over Twitter.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      You’re right, that’s definitely what Sam is trying to do here. Unfortunately for him, he’s still an idiot, and he’s inadvertently telling on himself here by openly confirming what’s been well understood for a while; ChatGPT simply is not profitable to run because the models are so stupidly inefficient. That’s a real problem, and one that they’ve shown no meaningful plan for solving.

  • nomad@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 days ago

    Strange coincidence right as they want to convert to a for-profit company structure. “Bro we are not even making profits, nothing to see here bro”

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s because the whole thing is stupid. Is made by stupids, marketed to stupids, paid by stupids, and for the most part used by stupids. Because they’re stupid.

    There’s a pattern in there if you look closely.

    • sepi@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      I feel like you’re putting it down, but for the life of me, I am not picking it up. Can you please try explaining again, but slower? Use simple words. Like I’m stupid or something.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        If AI cost peanuts to run, this would be a very reasonable point. But it doesn’t. It’s staggeringly expensive to operate something like ChatGPT.

        So any use of genAI has to consider the question “Do the benefits provided actually justify the cost?”

        Obviously, in a capitalist society this turns into “How can we monetize this?”, but even in a fully socialist society it would still be necessary to ask if this technology is actually providing sufficient societal benefit to actually justify the material resource cost of running it.

    • ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      The amount of money stupid gives to stupid, though. Makes my stomach churn. So much for so little.

    • babybus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Or you’re stupid because you can’t use LLMs effectively, don’t understand their value, and now you’re angry because of that.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    What is the use case for a $200 a month AI subscription? It’s a lot of money to spend on a novelty, clearly people are finding it useful.

        • whatwhatwhatwhat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          I run tech for a midsize business, and consult for several small businesses. Aside from one 4-person company, all of the businesses I oversee found it less expensive to host their own LLM in Azure than to pay for OpenAI’s subscriptions. I’m talking 10% of the cost of subscriptions for the same functionality.

          The midsize business in particular has only seen measurable benefit from more specialized/global applications of “AI” tools, such as integrating machine learning into data analytics. There are a ton of people who use the LLM chat, but I think the mishaps caused by the LLM may have undone any efficiency gains. Either way, I’m sure glad they’re not paying hundreds of thousands of dollars annually for it.

            • whatwhatwhatwhat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Fair. We’re using 4o and o1-mini right now, because access to the full o1 is waitlisted in Azure. However based on some brief review of their pricing for o1, I’d say we’re still going to save a metric fuckton of money compared to per-user subscriptions.

        • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Any of the businesses that have hopped on the AI train. $200/month is basically the price of a single Indian call center employee. A company can pay for the AI subscription and fire 90% of the call center, using humans only for escalation.

        • fluxion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Businesses that think shoving AI tools down everyone’s throat will create superior productivity so they can lay off workers

  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    Bruh. Meanwhile I’m still with my free and libre Mistral-7B I refined using my own WhatsApp messages and I almost never use it…

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      You don’t use it because the AI already took over your life and murdered your biological counterpart