• reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sucks that the author of the article’s takeaway is basically “don’t do original non-franchise films.” I thought

    Tap for spoiler

    Mickey 17 captured the unique narration tone of Mickey7 but left something on the table when it came to 7s relationship with 8–they were supposed to have essentially the same personality. Also was annoyed with Pattinson’s voice. Whole thing suffered from lack of focus, adding the preacher angle in was unnecessary and not comical, and the plots were not well woven.

    • Ilandar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Also was annoyed with Pattinson’s voice.

      I have the complete opposite take, I thought the voice he created for the character was great.

      spoiler

      The narration was hilarious, he sounded so stupid and resigned to his tragic comedy of a life and the way they paired that with a lot of visual gags made the first two thirds of the film so enjoyable for me. To me, where it really fell off was the final third which became a very slow, linear trudge towards a very predictable Hollywood happy ending. Every scene from the post-attempted assassination arrests onward dragged so badly.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Mickey wasn’t a idiot though. Ironically it just became a typical Hollywood attack on the working man rather than depicting a lower class character that likes to read about history but doesn’t have skills his society demands he have in order to respect his personhood.