• TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, for all the issues fallout 4 had at least Bethesda finally figured out how to make guns that don’t suck to use

      • essell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I dunno. FO4 had that horrible experience where enemies take a couple dozen bullets to die.

        Not exactly elegant

        • misery mansion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 hours ago

          When I played it I found this ridiculous handmade pistol with a two shot magazine that I upgraded the fuck out of. Those two shots did so much damage I often didn’t need to suffer the extremely slow reload speed, it was awesome.

          My main beef with FO4 is I couldn’t really give less of a shit about designing and building bases and wished I could have fully not bothered with it.

          As someone who doesn’t care at all for Minecraft, it has cast a pretty long shadow over games ever since (looking at you tears of the kingdom)

        • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Depends on your skill level. Which it should in an rpg. Fallout 4 found the best balance yet imo. Including starfield.

      • Jumi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        After taking out almost all RPG elements they have to compare to shooters and in that comparison they drown so hard.

    • P00ptart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The most annoying thing to me is that even starfield still can’t make a lifelike facial expression. This is stuff other companies have been able to do for 15+ years.