• NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I don’t know, we need to do a better job of advertising this stuff if a lot of people don’t know about it. This is one of the few decent things the U.S. is doing.

    • Xell22@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I caught it through NPR maybe a couple weeks before it happened, and some science YouTubers were hype about it, but other than that I caught very little coverage. Not a lot mentioned on here that I saw til the day of or the day before. Not that it wasn’t talked about here before that, but just what I noticed.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Long as we have to depend on chemical propellants, the moon is as far as we’ll ever get

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Well the solar panels all deployed and are charging, but yeah using chemical burns isn’t good for much beyond orbital movement

      • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Still need a reliable method to convert the power gained from solar into propulsion with enough force so that it won’t take a decade to get anywhere

        • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          The nuclear reflection engine is still our best bet, I feel like it may take actual zero G experiments to solve but I think we can achieve fusion

  • melfie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    SLS has gotten a lot of well-deserved hate for being an expendable money pit. All that aside, damn, it lifted off with humans in it and off to the moon! There’s no other currently available rocket that can do that, including Starship.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    America, fast going backwards, has today reached 1969 1968, assuming that this mission succeeds.

    (Edit: this is not even a moon landing so more Apolo 8 than Apolo 11).

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      A truly pointless waste of money. This is what we did with all the cancer research money cut from NIH.

      While Whitey’s on the moon.

      • chinaski@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Terrible take. A lot of what we know in science is due to NASA research. NASA is <0.5% of the federal budget. There are plenty of egregious things we are wasting money on to be upset about - this is not one of them.

        • BrioxorMorbide@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 day ago

          And a lot of the NASA science budget was cut because it was too boring for the toddler administration who want to play with their flashy toys.

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            the budget was moved over to SpaceX on the lie of private sector efficiency. But to the credit of SpaceX, they did blow up more rockets than the inefficient NASA ever did.

          • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            It was largely restored under the 2026 congressional budget at levels similar to 2025. The trump administration tried to punish centers in blue states by taking away their funding, the worst of which was Goddard with a 50% budget cut. Basically they tried to cancel nearly every earth observing science mission, which is Goddards bread and butter.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          NASA is <0.5% of the federal budget

          that’s <0.5% more than cancer research.

          A lot of what we know in science is due to NASA research

          Someone not in STEM would say this. NASA has some important projects, this is not one of them.

          Sending up this rocket accomplishes NOTHING. This is an idiot project based on moon colony fantasy and a way to shovel more tax $ to Elon Musk and SpaceX while people clap and holler like idiots.

          This poem from 1970 illustrates exactly how far the US has progressed in 55 years:

          A rat done bit my sister Nell.

          (with Whitey on the Moon)

          Her face and arms began to swell.

          (and Whitey’s on the Moon)

          I can’t pay no doctor bill.

          (but Whitey’s on the Moon)

          Ten years from now I’ll be paying still.

          (while Whitey’s on the Moon)

          Except we can update 10 years to 20 years.

          • CptEnder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Someone not in STEM would say this

            So you then? Because anyone who has to work with grants to fund their research knows this isn’t how this works at all. Lmao go back to Reddit.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 day ago

        Right, it’s definitely this and not the 200 billion dollar budget of ICE, or all the resources going towards the war in Iran right now.

      • melfie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        While Whitey’s on the moon

        At least the crew for this mission includes a black guy and a woman, unlike the 24 white dudes who crewed the Apollo missions.

    • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Same way moon landing deniers do.

      “The whole thing is staged! Nobody actually flew anywhere! They just put some guys in costumes and filmed them on a sound stage in Hollywood!”

    • TastyWheat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I had a guy come into my shop yesterday and we started talking about the launch, and he said the exact same thing to me. We ended up having a good laugh about flat earthers and having a good ol fashioned space chat. Good bloke!

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Please don’t let it be cancelled and returned early because of a toilet That would just be too much. This is the first thing that has made me legitimately excited since having to unexpectedly say goodbye to my soul-dog last month. I need this, dammit.

    • bthest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      How exactly do you think they’d return prematurely? Hit the reverse button?

      • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Its the entire reason they did a full orbit before firing the lunar injection burn, so that if something was wrong they could jettison the service module and perform a deorbit burn for an early splashdown in the pacific.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can’t we get a single article without mentioning how shitty the U.S is right now? Half of the comments here aren’t even ontopic.

    Going back to the moon is still an engineering feat, even if we’ve done it before. That was a generation ago, and all of those engineers are retired or about to.

    • melfie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      AFAIK, the service module is European, built by the ESA, so this is not 100% an American accomplishment.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean I kinda see manned missions as pointless. I would like us to remotely create destinations before going through the added expense of people and I think the technology gains would be bigger.

          • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m going to ignore the obvious Kindergarten joke (which I’ve made myself).

            I would be happy to send a probe to Uranus. We know a lot less about the outer planets bcz we’ve really only done a few flybys of them.

            • Lucius_Sweet@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              The kindergarten joke was the entire point of the comment.

              In your rush to get mean dig in on the previous commenter, you willfully misunderstood or misinterpreted their point.

            • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              It’s funny, because things I’ve watched recently have been pronouncing it YOUR-uh-nus, versus your-A-nus. Dunno when we made the change, but 25-30 years ago, it was butthole.

              But jokes aside, I want to see something like the Parker Solar Probe, but out. Fastest thing ever created, by a large margin, and second place is the goddamn manhole cover. I’m assuming the science can’t exactly slingshot something straight out like that, wave to Voyager Uno and Voyager Dos, and see what’s happening.

              I’m no scientist though, but let’s go.

        • HubertManne@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          now we just need the construction of destinations. we are well on our way tom completing the initial preliminary work before we start what should be the main effort.

    • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Can’t we get a single article without mentioning how shitty the U.S is right now? Half of the comments here aren’t even on topic.

      My friend, the toilet was clogged on the rocket.

      Toilet= shitty

      Seems on topic to me

    • TransNeko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m surprised that Trump didn’t sign an EO declaring that it was now the Trump space mission rather than Artemis II.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t care what we call it, as long as we keep funding the science and engineering. The amount of people who don’t understand why we should do this stuff is astounding. And I’m honestly not the best at articulating why we should do it.

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t see the point of sending people to the moon or Mars. It will always be insanely expensive to do anything there, always. What is there to discover that can’t be done with robots? Doing it for the poetic sake of doing it--“going where no man has gone before”-- seems impractical and wasteful.

      Yes, we’ve done it in the past, exploring, that doesn’t mean we must keep doing it as it becomes more impractical, and with what benefits, exactly? Exploiting whatever resources are there? Is that really what we should be doing?

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, why do things! Let’s just sit on our ass and stagnate!

          Let’s do the same thing over and over again and call it progress! Next time you are in a hospital watching a loved one dying of cancer, you can tell them how many times we flew around the moon!

          We can’t breathe, the earth is on fire…let’s do another moon victory lap!

          • YetiBeets@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            The world doesn’t have enough supply of organs for transplant

            We cannot grow synthetic organs on earth because complex tissue collapses under its own weight during the growing process on earth

            Space has much lower gravity. We might be able to grow synthetic organs there.

            When I’m old and my Grandkids can get full organ transplants with kidneys grown on the moon, I just might thank the Artemis missions.

          • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Those things are not mutually exclusive. Why are you so angry about this when the military budget request this year was over 892 billion dollars?

            NASA’s budget is less than 0.35% of the what was spent the previous year, which was over 7 trillion dollars.

            If you want to be angry at something, you should direct it toward the asshats in charge who refuse to fund our Healthcare, infrastructure, and yes, cancer research.

            You’re right to be upset, but you are directing it a the wrong stuff.

      • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        The moon is a good stopping off point for the rest of the solar system. Launching interplanetary missions from the moon is much easier assuming a moon base exists

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Why waste billions when we can waste trillions!

          you guys realize NASA probes have already gone beyond the solar system?

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Im on the same page. I feel we should concentrate on discovery with probes or rovers and such and automation. trying to mine something robotically on an asteroid. if we can do that then see if we can smelt it. See if we can create fuel in space and such. I don’t think we will progress at all till we can be sourcing and manufacturing in space.

          • HubertManne@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            if thats the case then going into space is rediculous because if we at some point can’t source and build our there then there is no future out there.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Can’t we get a single article without mentioning how shitty the U.S is right now?

      So you concede this is all about distraction.

      Let’s discover antibiotics again!

    • JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      If I’ve learned anything from realistic space fiction, it’s that they won’t find any up there.

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        we can also just look at who are currently the faces of the private space race, and their beliefs and how they run their companies

  • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    whew. i’ve rolled the dice on my life, but i’ve never gotten on a boeing spacecraft. and the shitter’s already clogged.

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Right, my mistake. Shitter is clogged tho. Seriously. I know how to design a clogproof shitter (you need a mashing stick) and look what they did.

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Space toilets are complicated. They don’t have gravity assisting the flush. You’d be surprised how even simple stuff we take for granted on Earth is complex when you take away gravity.

          • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            yeah i am making a little fun because oh my gods why did they not consult the spends their entire life on the toilet community because we can solve any toilet clogging problem with a wire hangar.

    • CptEnder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      SLS is mostly designed by Lockeed-Martin and NASA SRC. Boeing was a private contractor too though. This is also the first space toilet we’ve put in a spacecraft and exactly why we’re doing this test flight.

  • JATth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    They launched the integrity of the USA off the planet, so it won’t bother them anymore for a few days.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Very often, I was like “I don’t think I need to watch this shuttle launch, they might have to scrub it” and then they’d actually launch and I was was like “damn, I should have watched that shuttle launch”.

    So I was like “naaah, I don’t think I need to watch this launch, they might scrub it” and now it looks like they’ve launched and I was like “shit, I fell for that again, I’m really stupid”

    • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      The shuttle is Lucy holding the football and you live in a Charlie Brown world. ✌

    • JATth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I watched the live stream of the launch. You never know what happens until the rocket has reached space. From significant past launches was the launch of JWST, that was truly nerve racking and exciting, although no people were on the board.

      Hopefully nothing will break, and we perhaps get a moon base in this century. (we do have more urgent things to research, but space research tends to produce more eye-opening and unexpected results.)

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh what’s next, will Spain send three wooden boats to the New World, take a few pictures, and come back?

      • NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Greetings Moon Men! We mean you no harm. We simply come in search of delicious herbs and spices. And to help you run your own longstanding society, about which we clearly know best. Cough, cough. Sorry, we are a bit under the weather with some Earth pathogens - you ARE immune, are you not?