“It’s also worth reiterating that despite its name, OpenAI is a closed-source and for-profit company — while DeepSeek’s AI models are open-source.”
Smells like there’s a lawsuit just around the corner. How do you license a model as open source if the training data was stolen?
Hahahahahahaha.
I think he has exceeded his lifetime quota of irony.
Oh no is the widdle data thief mad his stolen data was stolen?
Someone call the waaambulance.
that’s fine, from what I understand AI projects can’t have copyright so even if the claim is true they can cry about it.
See, so when they steal from US, it’s fine. But when someone steals from THEM, suddenly we have a problem 🖕
Little known rule of society: it’s OK to steal from people poorer than you.
That’s the free market at work baby. Regs for thee but not for mee.
I don’t believe any of these assholes about anything tbh.
Oh cry me a river, DeepSeek is OpenSource, OpenAI (Which should be renamed to ClosedAI) isn’t
DeepSeek is the more ethical AI toolkit for one to use, at least they’re not pretentious
DeepSeek is Open Weight, as in weights are available*
Anything needed to actually train the model is as closed as ClosedAI is.
Oh noooo!
Anyway.
Before reading any articles concerning Deep Seek’s origin, it took me awhile to realise that they probably stole the data and technology from Western AI developers. Developing a better AI and as open source that quickly is pretty much impossible. And everyone knows that CCP steal IP and technology from the West so it’s unsurprising.
You do realized that’s based as hell right?
China steals from the west and uses it to improve their peoples lives instead of just squeezing them for every filthy penny possible?
You do understand that’s a moral, ethical, and economic China W don’t you?
What happened in Tianamen in 1989, Deep Seek?
Developing a better AI and as open source that quickly is pretty much impossible.
According to whom?
so because openAI stole their corpus of training info first, they get to call others thieves?
lol…
It’s still stealing regardless of who called dibs first.
I don’t disagree at all. I think there’s going to be a reckoning when one of these companies finally makes a product that earns a profit.
Spoiler - It’ll be a Chinese company.
could be. could honestly come from anywhere.
“It’s only okay if western companies steal.” duh!
There’s a name for that. It’s called “karma”.
But, DeepSeek wouldn’t be able to make money without using OpenAI.
Same what OpenAI said about copyright material they used to train ChatGPT.
Felony contempt of business model
This is a “not the onion” level headline, holy shit
Inconceivable.
