• enkers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not sure they’ve thought this through… If CEOs start hiring armed guards, then doesn’t the next Luigi just become one? Uber-like services aren’t exactly known for their stringent hiring practices.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      This isn’t for CEOs. This is for people with more money than sense who are also paranoid as fuck. CEOs can afford to hire security that they can run thorough background checks on.

      • enkers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s literally being marketed to them…

        From the article:

        Who is this for, you might ask? A video posted on January 6, 2025, that runs just over two minutes gives the game away. It opens with a photo of assassinated UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. “We’re going to run through a scenario to demonstrate, where if a Protector had been present, crisis could have been averted,” the Protector says in the video. He then runs through several fantasy versions of the assassination where a Protector is on hand to prevent the assassin from killing the CEO.

        Also,

        This is for people with more money than sense who are also paranoid as fuck.

        You’ve just described CEOs.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          No, it’s literally being marketed to paranoid people.

          Do you honestly think CEOs of major corporations would stoop to hiring their security through a non-vetted app?

          • enkers@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Absolutely. Almost no CEO would’ve had a security detail before now. Also, minimising costs is their lifeblood. They’ll definitely be using this.

            Your average paranoid Joe can’t afford to hire some goons to hang around him. And the people on the board of investors don’t need celebrity like CEOs do, so they’re largely unknown to the public, so don’t need this service.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’m sorry… you think CEOs would be cheap with protecting their own lives? These are people who own multiple mansions and have collections of sport cars.

              And of course no CEO would have one before now. No one was suggesting otherwise. But now they do. And there are already companies out there they can hire that have vetted, experienced people who come heavily-armed and highly-trained, so why would they use this app?

              • P00ptart@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                A lot of CEOs have had security teams for ages. Like UHC said themselves, they get death threats all the time.

              • enkers@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I’m sorry… you think CEOs would be cheap with protecting their own lives?

                Quite literally, yes. Their commitment to being as cheap as possible is pathological. Not frugal, cheap.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I don’t understand how one can have multiple mansions and luxury cars, and then we get into things like the tailored suits and the fancy dinners, and also be cheap. That fits no definition of the word ‘cheap’ I know.

    • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      The beauty of Luigi’s* escapade is that they had no fucking clue who he was until they arrested him - over a hundred miles away in fucking Pennsylvania. If he had committed to the bit and put more thought into the getaway he probably could have gotten away with it completely.

      You get hired by this service, they will have all your personal info and that will get handed over to authorities immediately if you went rogue. You would be an FBI top 10 fugitive and have millions of dollars spent on bringing you in, warm or cold.

      *allegedly, innocent until proven guilty, etc.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        All your personal info, assuming you didn’t fake any of it.

        How thoroughly are they going to check that stuff?

        Gig economy businesses rely on disposable work force. The deal they’re offering is horrible for their “employees,” but because they only pay for the work that actually gets done they can afford to just hire every applicant and let them fight among themselves for a limited amount of available work.

        Stringent application controls and serious background checks are anathema to that business model.

  • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 days ago

    Systematically driving down the wages of the people you expect to catch a bullet for you by gig-ifying their industry seems like a pretty terrible idea if you’re someone who depends on armed security for your continued existence.

    I guess I’ll go make some popcorn.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Awesome idea for an app!

    The capitalists will “efficiency” aka be greedy and pocket what they should have spent on their app’s vetting process into being useless, basically opening the door to hiring potential heroes who wish to do the right thing being given the capitalist’s location and being invited to show up armed.

    Five stars!

  • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Would you trust your life to be well-protected by someone you hire for $18/hour in a gig economy?

    Grifters gonna grift.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    Brilliant, just the thing I need to protect me from all the disgusting poors that I’ve fucked over to become obscenely wealthy; gig workers with no job security!

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Countdown to when they make the public pay for it again like they did when they pushed for their private security to be made into police forces.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sure would be a shame if a bunch of normal people hired them for bachelorette parties and stuff, preventing them from responding to CEO requests.

    Just sayin’… our 15th Wedding Anniversary is coming up, who wouldn’t want an Escalade entourage? ;)

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s who is going to be hiring them though. People who have no need for such security because they were never in any danger to begin with, but had the money to throw away on this either because they’re paranoid or they want to show off.

      CEOs can afford Academi.

  • TheFogan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    What’s more baffling to me, why the hell is it high up in the rankings on an app store? Are there that many wealthy people that have killed millions with pens? Least I thought apps were ranked by how many people use them rather than how much money they bring in). Plus you’d figure most the people in the budget to be hiring motorcades… would be better served hiring a few full time security guards.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Plus you’d figure most the people in the budget to be hiring motorcades… would be better served hiring a few full time security guards.

      One thing you can never underestimate is just how cheap some of these cunts are.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          If that were the case, it would almost be understandable. But so many of these twats couldn’t spend all their money in a single lifetime - anyone who has an 9-digit net worth (or mid-level 8-digit) could pay my monthly rent every day of their lives and, without making another cent, still die with more money than I will make in ten lifetimes.

          Yet they prefer to cheat people - for example, out of a measly few hundred dollars in legally-mandated and agreed-upon overtime pay per year - to the most basic, fundamental decency.

          Not even by their own professed values of well-negotiated mutual contractual obligations are they decent human beings, and that’s a low fucking bar.