ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agoAbility of holding ruleslemmy.worldimagemessage-square87linkfedilinkarrow-up1845arrow-down117
arrow-up1828arrow-down1imageAbility of holding ruleslemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square87linkfedilink
minus-squaregrrgyle@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 day agoThis is a really bad definition because it very obviously excludes people who transition to women later in life.
minus-squaresuperkret@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·edit-21 day agoThat’s intentional. But it’s also a really bad definition because it excludes most women over the age of 50.
minus-squarerambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·20 hours agoTechnically not. They were born with the ability to hold eggs but lost it. Not saying I agree with the transphobe, but the definition technically doesn’t exclude the elderly.
This is a really bad definition because it very obviously excludes people who transition to women later in life.
That’s intentional.
But it’s also a really bad definition because it excludes most women over the age of 50.
Technically not. They were born with the ability to hold eggs but lost it. Not saying I agree with the transphobe, but the definition technically doesn’t exclude the elderly.