• king_comrade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If it were a man fucking 1000 girls in a day, we’d all celebrate. What’s more unattractive than a high body count? Insecurity.

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m not disagreeing with the point of your statement, but I do want to clarify that vaginas absolutely stretch, just not permanently. You’ll have a very different experience if you work up to fisting over a couple of hours vs. launching right into it, because vaginas loosen with arousal.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The important thing is that they are elastic - they don’t stay stretched. They’re not like sweaters that stay stretched out forever after someone large wears them, more like rubber bands that stretch temporarily before returning to their typical size. I think that’s why OP used the term “stretch out,” as too many people seem to think once a vagina stretches, it’s a permanent change. It’s such a weird misconception.

        Giving birth stretches a vagina more than any penis (or fist) ever could. Though birth can make some changes that last, it’s more like “Now I need a larger size menstrual cup” than “Now penises just slide back out,” as the popular belief would have people believe.

        • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yeah I was gonna mention the menstrual cup thing. The fact that they perceive the vagina as a purely receptive sleeve also suggests that they’ve rarely if ever had a woman orgasm on their dick. Hubs reports varying perceptibility between different episodes but that the muscular contraction is often robust.

    • JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      If they don’t stretch out, then why do some doctors offer complimentary tightening surgery on postpartum mothers?

      • RBWells@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Ouch. That is so fucked up. I am older and have been structurally tight (skin too tight at opening) sex hurts when it goes on too long. The “husband stitch” is abusive. And doctors do it because they do episiotomy, which is also awful because that cut doesn’t heal as well as a repaired natural tear and you might not tear at all.

        Complimentary tightening surgery my ass. That doesn’t help mothers at all.

        Rehab with kegels does help and obviously if you tear, a repair. The midwife recommended working up to fisting before having a baby and man I wish I had taken that advice.

        But being tight right at the opening of the vagina just hurts, there is no advantage to it.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 day ago

        They don’t stretch out from having a dick put in them. But giving birth is literally a physically traumatic event. Ligiments get slack so bones can shift around, and it is not uncommon for the flesh around the vagina to experience significant tearing. The whole thing is quite horrifying. Post pregnancy medical procedures may be necessary not just to have a tight pussy, but to be able to not constantly be peeing yourself.

        • deft@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Yeah go make any mom laugh they will tell you they’re gonna pee their pants

          Source: milfs

        • JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          32
          ·
          1 day ago

          litigation

          🤣

          What’s sexist about perpetuating the idea that vaginas do or don’t stretch out? Or what’s sexist about doctors offering to tighten up stretched vaginas? Please explain.

          • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            21 hours ago

            It’s called “the husband stitch” becase because it was done for the husbands pleasure, not for the wife’s medical needs, often without the wife’s consent. It also might cause sex to be more painful for the woman, even as it was more pleasurable for the man; which is too bad for the woman, because her husband had a legal right to rape her in the United States until the 1970s.

          • obelisk_complex@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            21 hours ago

            The only thing dumber than your comments is the Piefed decision to replace the downvote button with an emoji button that doesn’t load until just before I try to click the close button.

            Sexist men tell women they have loose vaginas to try and shame them for their sex organs. Arguing it’s true is also sexist.

      • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I don’t know, but I read that vinegar not only clears any bad smells but also tightens it up.

          • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I don’t think you know what you’re talking about or your fellow downvoters. I read that in a reputable publication over well about three decades back and I take their word over some naysayer online with no backup information or sources.

            Not only that but I’ve had women tell me it’s true that vinegar cleans smells and tightens the area. You are not a reputable source.

            • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Youre not right about this. Im sorry. Some women do douche, but most doctors will advise against using anything like this. Mild soap externally is all that is recomended by most Obgyns.

              This info you have is old wives tales, not modern science.

    • endless_nameless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t think people caring about body count has anything to do with physical things other than drastically increased odds of STIs and certain cancers.

      I think mature adults realize that sex is never just sex, it forms attachments whether you want it or not. Screwing around forming and cutting off attachments constantly kind of fucks with your capacity to emotionally invest in an actual relationship.

      • poke@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not everyone does form those attatchemnts. There are plenty of poeole out there who can just have sex and have a good time and move on.

          • Jiggle_Physics@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            That cuts both ways. Who wants someone that becomes obsessed with them. So small body count is out too.

        • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          Which is equally as worrying, to people who disapprove of high “body count” on assumption that emotional attachments were made

      • fracture@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        i think the way you’re describing the process as “screwing around, forming and cutting off attachments” really shows that you think of it in a very black and white sort of way. one can have casual / fwb sex with their friends, and still have a friend relationship with that person. one can even have one-off sex with an acquaintance or stranger, and even if you never meet again, it doesn’t really make it a “cut off” relationship; if you met again, it would be pleasant, circumstances just may not arrange it

        just because it’s a more emotionally involved process for you or some people you’ve encountered, doesn’t make it a universal truth

        • endless_nameless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Sure, you CAN do these things. That doesn’t mean it’s not diminishing your capacity to be emotionally invested in your relationships.

          We can spend all day blowharding and traversing all the layers of subconscious processes abstracted into social constructs, how we are able to rationalize anything if we want to, and so on. But I think you can only get so far with that, when all I’m trying to describe is something pretty much everyone already understands intuitively.

          “You can’t turn a hoe into a housewife”

          Works with gender/role flipped too, obviously.

          • fracture@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            i genuinely do not “intuitively understand” this idea. there’s nothing contradictory about being a hoe and a housewife

            can you like, explain this? i really don’t understand how having multiple sexual relationships, specifically, diminishes one’s ability to have emotionally fulfilling relationships. if anything, i might be inclined to think they would have more emotionally fulfilling relationships 💀

    • Fleur_@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      For me it sure does. Fuck ass people insisting that it’s not okay to disqualify people from your dating pool is stupid

      • Ricky Rigatoni@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Everybody’s always saying you can deny a relationship with anyone for any reason until it’s a reason they personally don’t agree with.

        • Malyca@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          You have the right to refuse for any reason, that doesn’t absolve you of how you will be perceived though.

          • Signtist@bookwyr.me
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            11 hours ago

            There it is. You can choose not to date anyone for any reason, but if you’re smart you won’t tell anyone.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I mean, any reason for not wanting a relationship is a good reason because a relationship where one person doesn’t even really want it is going to be a shit relationship.

          That said, I might still judge you if your reasons are shitty.

    • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      1 day ago

      According to Wikipedia it’s true, and as a world record attempt a notary must have been present to count the men. There’s another job I don’t envy.

      • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t get the point of notaries. Anyone could be a notary – you just have to pinky promise that you saw something happen under oath

        • rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Anyone could be a notary – you just have to pinky promise that you saw something happen under oath

          The notary has to be approved by the State. Basically, if a notary attests to some fact, it is as if the entire government bore witness to it.

          • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            has to be approved by the State.

            That’s still just a glorified pinky promise… I guess what I’m trying to say is that being notary sounds like a super easy job

        • ChexMax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Yeah I mean you pay money and take a little course to become a notary and you have to reup every year (or three years? I can’t remember). The point is you take on legal liability. A notary cannot claim, “i didn’t realize, I didn’t know, I didn’t double check.” Most of the money you pay is in liability insurance in case you screw up. Because if a notary stamps their name to something false, they bear the legal liability which is enough for a notary to not take the risk of flippantly stamping things that are untrue.

          You can also legally marry people.

          There are also legal limits to how much you can charge (like 10 bucks and document or something. It’s not much). Since each stamp doesn’t earn much, but the liability could cost you a lot, it keeps notaries pretty honest. It’s a decent system.

          Mostly only nerds are notaries anyway, so the promising and putting your name to something does some of the heavy lifting by itself

        • clif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          You think that someone would break the sacred oath they took to become a notary? What is this world coming to…

  • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    you’re an incentive if you care about bodycount

    Maybe, but I do care about orders of magnitude in bodycount. Being in the low single digits myself I definitely prefer partners that do not have a bodycount three orders of magnitude higher.

    • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I definitely prefer partners that do not have a bodycount three orders of magnitude higher.

      And didn’t attain it in “one sitting,” i.e one session just to have sex with 1000 people. I don’t think i believe she even did that.

    • EtnaAtsume@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      94
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Neurodivergent middle-aged Linux using anti-AI nostalgiagoggle-wearing very online privacy enthusiast with some degree of fixation on tech, be that privately (their hobby) or professionally (their job).

    • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Depends on the instance:

      • LW/FHF users: Basically Redditors but mildly more elitist and significantly more male dominated
      • Feddit.de users: Like the previous one except german
      • DB0/FAF users: Nerdy, queer, and very leftist, also somewhat generally pro-ai (I may be biased here)
      • Blahaj users: Very lesbian, very trans, many catgirls, lots of Linux users :3
      • ML/Hex/etc users: Very leftist, very aggressive when approached with nonsense, gets into arguments with people whos minds will never be changed
  • ikt@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    i’m more concerned about how many guys were lining up

    Maybe after the first 10 it should direct the queue into a room with a therapist to work out whatever problems they’ve got

  • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    She must be like the biggest porn addict of her sex, to even want to do that. After a while she’s not going to be taking any pleasure from the experience.

    In a way it’s disrespectful to people who’ve undergone similar sexual assault - does she not realise many women are literally scared of having sex with men or even being around men they don’t trust? It’s weird.

    • unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      How is it disrespectful to women who have experienced “similar” sexual assault (bearing in mind, this wasn’t sexual assault, she literally asked for it and planned it all out)? By that logic, it would be disrespectful to women who have experienced sexual assault for women to have sex at all.

      • klankin@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 day ago

        You may not realise this, but a historical problematic influencer called Adolf Hitler was actually an oxygen addict, and so by referencing a breathable atmosphere youre being incredibly antisemitic.

        Hope this helps!