• VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I saw a guy doing moral outrage that men sometimes goon it crazy style in public.

    It’s pixels. It’s thousands of pixels arranged on a screen that make your imagination see a real person.

    When people act like it’s indecent I’m always like, “oh no the witch pixels have formed the horny configuration”

    Just taking the piss btw, read what you want in public it’s a damn book. Stores still sell brown paper bags to use as covers, right?

    • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      Except there’s no imagination required if you’re displaying an image. An accidental glance at one is very different than the other.

      Overall, poor comparison, 2/10.

    • Wren@lemmy.todayOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      1 month ago

      Next let’s compare dropping bombs to reading about the war.

      • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Let’s contrast instead!

        “Goon it crazy style” was just to be funny. What’s the actual difference in watching porn in public and smut novels if you’re not jorkin it and nobody sees the screen?

        • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Not a great comparison–a better one would be reading something like Playboy in public, if the cover were no more “scandalous” than the cover of a smutty romance novel. In this case, other people know what you’re doing.

          If you’re watching a video and no one can see the screen (and you’re not gooning it crazy style) then there’s no problem, and no controversy–you’re being discreet.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          Men get visible boners, women don’t.

          Unless you have a thermal camera, there’s no way to know what she’s reading (if it’s on an e-reader at least)

      • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Your own example would be more akin to watching a documentary vs reading about it. No one actually dies by you doing so.

        • Wren@lemmy.todayOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s not like any of the examples. Someone is equating reading smutty romance to public masturbation.

          I honestly didn’t see this going in this direction, I’m pretty fascinated by the reaction here.

          • Viceversa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Someone is equating reading smutty romance to public masturbation.

            …to public watching nude images, not to masturbation.

          • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            The only “someone” I’ve seen talking about public masturbation is you. :/ The “Goon it crazy” was clearly a hyperbole, given this posts’ context.

            And I’m not too surprised about the reaction. While the OP (from Bluesky, not you) definitely made a brand new sentence, the take is not particularly bright.

            • Wren@lemmy.todayOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              The “Goon it crazy” was clearly a hyperbole

              So …so was the sentence?

              Did someone take a lighthearted meme community too seriously?

              • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                The OPs’ sentence? Yes clearly.

                Yours? I’m not entirely convinced. Or at least it’s not only a hyperbole, given your other comments in this thread.

    • Zozano@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      Masturbating in public is just vibrating atoms moving together, like everything else. If you dont like watching me crank my hog to Sonic hentai, then maybe you dont respect physics.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Nah, he’d probably just fuck a dog in the public square and laugh and say that all human morality is an absurd construct used to enslave the minds of the uncritical masses

        • Windex007@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, basically this.

          I think he’d also use the extreme liberty of the argument “words can’t hurt you, you puritain prudes” to find out how committed to that argument people really were. And I don’t think it would take long.

  • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is fucking stupid. The moral outrage at smut is also stupid, but this is a monumentally idiotic way to argue that point. The Turner Diaries are also ‘just letters,’ as are the bible, the CIA’s ‘enhanced interrogation techniques’ manual, the ‘Letter From a Birmingham Jail,’ Romeo & Juliet, Anti-Oedipus, and your friend’s suicide note.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes yes the more unpopular I am the more right I am very logical you are a smart person and that is a reasonable and not defensive take

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Oh no! A string of letters has taken on an offensive configuration! I must downvote to demonstrate that words are meaningless!

          Does that really make sense to you?

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I see you agree that I am more righter than you, tyvm

            Edit: ah bro couldn’t help himself but admit I am double+ more righter 😔

            • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              In the context of this conversation, it is kind of amazing how you see words as just formulas we re-mix and thow at each other to win (declare victory?) in internet arguments; it is pretty strong implicit support for your position.

  • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    People in here comparing looking at porn images in public as if it’s comparable to a smutty book. I dunno, man. It would take effort to read someone else’s book in order to know what it’s even saying. But pulling up a pornographic image doesn’t take any work to comprehend. One requires hovering over someone’s shoulder, getting in their space, and actively trying to figure out what they’re reading. The other requires no more than a glance around.

    As far as being appropriate in public, they really can’t be compared.

    • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think part of it is that the idea of viewing content that arouses you in public is a more horrifying idea for men than for women. Women can be aroused without anyone knowing, whereas the same is not generally true for men. So for men it seems more absurd for someone to be intentionally arousing themselves in public

      It is, in essence, the same as viewing porn in public if somehow no one else could easily see it. The underlying point is that its still sexual content

    • sh__@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Maybe it has to do with the other commenters point. If you took the polarizer off your screen and put it in your glasses so only you could see it, I still think it would be weird to watch porn in public. It is like a social norms thing for me about not intentionally getting yourself aroused in public.

    • pmk@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Once I tried to determine the least amount of pixels in a grid that would undeniably be considered lewd. 3x3 pixels can sort of contain a penis, but 2x2 pixels? Idk. But undeniably? Probably more. There must be a minimum number of pixels where the image would be clearly “inappropriate”.

  • root@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    this can be applied to anything

    theyre guns theyre a hump of firey metal you need to regulate metal? hahahahahahahaaaaha

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Are you really going to call me a terrorist just because I want to shoot some neutrons at a cluster of enriched uranium in a populated area? Seriously?

  • swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    When my grandma died, she had like a hundred of those books stashed around the house. Also, vodka in Maalox bottles. It was the first time I found out that grandmas can be freaks too lol

  • ramble81@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    She reads romance novels, someone else look at porn. My thought has always been “you prefer words, they prefer pictures, but fundamentally it’s no different”

  • underscores@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    you can read whatever you want and I’m not going to judge you but personally my frame of mind when horny is not something I want to experience in public

    with this in mind, by extension I understand the viewpoint of “people should not have that frame of mind in public”

    that being said I’m not gonna police anyone, and I also don’t care if you’re rock hard or gooping down there cause of something you’re reading. I would just prefer not to be

    • Gonzako@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s fair. I’ve personally done some outside play and you do have to be very careful with it. The thrill of possibly getting caught is fun, getting caught ain’t.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Reminds me of this book series called the Laundry Files. It is a unique mix between Men in Black, Lovecraftian Eldritch and Cosmic Horror, and The Office. In it, magic, monsters, interdimensional beings, eldritch gods, etc. are all real, a constant threat, and kept entirely hidden from the public by secret government organizations made up mostly of conscripted engineers, mathematicians, physicists, etc. who unwittingly discovered some deeper aspect of the universe.

    See, math and algorithms describe the rules and logic of the universe, and since the universe is actually filled with the occult, sometimes that math actually taps into aspects of the universe they weren’t expecting. Some can generate apparent magical effects. Some touch into realms whose inhabitants want released or don’t want to be bothered. Some algorithms have the capability of waking the great old ones that will destroy the world.

    So those people who get too close to such discoveries, they are quickly taken into custody, made to understand the secret nature and apocalyptic danger of the universe that they have been unknowningly dabbling with, conscripted into service of the highly bureaucratic Laundry Files to help protect the world from it, and bound with magical wards to prevent them from speaking of any of it with anyone outside of the organization.

    Applied mathematics and computer science are the magic spells of this universe. The increasing amount of compute in the world is pulling us ever close to the end of the universe. It’s a problem. But also, Susan in finance won’t approve a new coffe maker in the break room and a Succubus is your new supervisor. That’s the vibe this series brings. I love it.

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      unique mix between Men in Black, Lovecraftian Eldritch and Cosmic Horror, and The Office

      sounds like last week’s Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles game at my house.