cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/47299437

United flight 236 from Newark to Palma de Mallorca on Saturday night was forced to turn around just an hour after takeoff due to security concerns around a Bluetooth signal. Multiple Redditors claimed to be on the flight and reported that the crew repeatedly requested passengers to turn off their Bluetooth. According to one poster, […]

  • Kay Ohtie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    51 minutes ago

    The real reason is because some jackass turned their Bluetooth speaker on during a flight.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    56 minutes ago

    I suspect the personality profiles of people with who would make the joke of calling their bluetooth device “bomb” and people who would blow up an airplane full of people is almost diametrically opposite.

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    If they thought it was real, why wouldn’t they land at the closest airport? Why fly all the way back to the origin point?

  • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    That is one of the most bizarre articles I have ever read. Why in the world are we not allowed to know what the “four letter word” is?

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If you named a Bluetooth speaker “Just an ordinary Bluetooth speaker, nothing to see here”, would that be seen as an implied terrorist threat?

    • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Try naming it “Fuck ICE” and see what happens . . . or don’t, because for whatever reason the special snowflakes of that criminal org get really pissy when members of the public offer them honest and heartfelt feedback.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I guess you need to rename all your Bluetooth bombs before flying now. Thanks Obama.

  • murvel@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Multiple Redditors claimed to be on the flight

    The real reason for the turn-around

    • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      link

      So what I’m getting from this, is that you should use a VPN if you’re using the airports wifi.

      Like today’s sponsor…

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 hours ago

    What if I name my speaker “This bomb will explode if plane goes below 5k meters. To disarm it send 1000 bitcoin to 1Dkfz1uJ45zRXey2iZmvCZPfLDTPPw6KQt”?

  • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Just changed my phone’s Bluetooth name to “Not A Bomb”. Hopefully no one is confused by it.

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Now go on a flight with it active and see how well that goes.

      Almost every single aspect of airport security before and after you board is written in blood.

    • Admetus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I mean, a 12 year old is more likely than not to name a cylindrical boombox a ‘bomb’ and forget about it. Hopefully a sincere apology will suffice instead of a ban or criminal charges.

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        9 hours ago

        According to discussion about this elsewhere, there’s a bluetooth speaker model named ‘Bomb’ that defaults to that name, whose website, humorously, has been rate limited due to I’m sure more traffic than they’ve ever had in its entire existence.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Honestly, I don’t see any way this could result in criminal charges. It’s a Bluetooth name, not someone actually threatening with a weapon. It’s like walking around with a fake gun. You can’t be charged with anything without actual intent to deceive people, and good luck proving that.

        At most, this is a civil charge. The airline might try to get some money out of this person.

        • fizzle@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Naming a Bluetooth device “bomb” could absolutely be intentionally disruptive or threatening.

          Im not saying thats provable beyond reasonable doubt in this case.

        • chocrates@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You can still be prosecuted for things you didn’t intend, the laws are usually less harsh. Manslaughter vs Murder for instance. I have no idea if a speaker whose name auto sets to bomb is illegal though. Seems dumb if it were

        • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It could absolutely result in a criminal charge. If it results in a criminal conviction or not is another question.

          But any prosecutor could make the argument that it’s a terroristic threat.

        • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Poor chap. Chances are the person was flying economy. No way that person can give enough to recoup even the lawyer fees for the airline

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Yep. They might still try it to punish them/set an example. They’re not getting enough out of it to be worth it though, so odds are nothing happens.

  • whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    okay but, how does it make sense to fly during a longer period if you know that you’re transporting a bomb? (i know I shouldn’t try to make any sense out of this but still…)

  • potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    13 hours ago

    A certain four-letter word

    Poot?

    You can’t joke about that stuff in an airplane setting, they recirculate that air.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Did you ever see that youtube video from like 2 decades ago where the woman is standing up on the airplane while everyone else is seated, (and looking annoyed), while she waves her arms around yelling “THIS MAN FARTED!!! THIS MAN FARTED WHILE SEATED RIGHT NEXT TO ME!!! WE’RE SO CLOSE OUR ELBOWS TOUCHED BRIEFLY!!! HE FARTED!!! THAT WAS NOT ME THAT FARTED!!!”

      And everybody else is just looking at her like “Lady…shut the fuck up”.

      There are some youtube videos I wish I saved. Thats one.